Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 79
Filter
1.
Pesqui. bras. odontopediatria clín. integr ; 23: e220054, 2023. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS, BBO | ID: biblio-1521286

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Objective: To describe behaviors with oral hygiene items in single-bathroom households during the domiciliary isolation of individuals with positive 'Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction' (RTPCR+) in southern Brazil. Material and Methods: Cross-sectional study was conducted with Research and Monitoring Sector of COVID-19 data from Palhoça, Brazil, of individuals aged ≥18 years, living in a singlebathroom household, who had an RT-PCR positive. A link of Google Forms was used. Socio-demographic information, characteristics during the home isolation, oral hygiene, and behaviors with oral hygiene items in the bathroom were collected. Descriptive stratified analyses according to age were conducted (<40 and ≥40 years). Results: Among 524 individuals, 36% were aged ≥40 years. During isolation, according to the behaviors with oral hygiene items in the household single-bathroom, 70% (95%CI 64.9-75.5) of the youngest participants reported sharing toothbrushes in the same container and 30% (95%CI 24.4-35.1) of the oldest; use of the same toothpaste was reported by 67% (95%CI 62.8-71.7) of the youngest and 33% (95%CI 28.337.3) of the oldest participants. For the outcome of sharing the same toothpaste, the chances for the youngest and the oldest to share the same toothbrush container was 11 times and 6 times more, respectively. Conclusion: The individuals related good oral hygiene habits; however, behaviors with oral hygiene items in the bathroom were neglected, especially by the younger individuals.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Oral Hygiene/education , Toothbrushing/instrumentation , Preventive Dentistry , COVID-19/transmission , Chi-Square Distribution , Logistic Models , Cross-Sectional Studies/methods
2.
Article in English | LILACS, BBO | ID: biblio-1351218

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Objective: Tocompare the effect of tooth brushing on surface roughness of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement (RMGIC; GC Gold label 2LC Light Cured Universal Restorative) and Glass Hybrid (GH; GC EQUIA SYSTEM- EQUIA Forte™ Fil and EQUIA Forte™ Coat) restorative material at 1- and 3-months interval simulated by tooth brushing. Material and Methods: RMGIC and GH material specimens (20 each) were prepared according to manufacturer instructions in 10mm × 2 mm dimensions using a mylar strip. A specially designed toothbrush simulator was used along with Oral B Pro 2 2000N powered toothbrush and Colgate Total dentifrice (Colgate-Palmolive India limited; Relative dentin abrasivity - RDA:70- Low abrasive) to perform brushing strokes. Specimens were subjected to surface roughness analysis before and after simulated tooth brushing at baseline, 1, and 3 months. Results: The intragroup comparison was done using repeated-measures ANOVA. Intergroup comparisons were done using an independent sample t-test and General Linear Model (ANCOVA). Surface roughness increased from baseline through 3 months in both RMGIC and GH groups. The mean surface roughness in RMGIC group was significantly higher than GH group at baseline 1 and 3-months, respectively (p<0.001, <0.001, and <0.001). Interaction between group and baseline surface roughness was not significant (p=0.466). The estimated marginal means were significantly higher in RMGIC than GH group (p=0.008). Conclusion: The surface roughness of both RMGIC and GH restorative increased from baseline to 1 month and 3 months after the simulated toothbrushing protocol. GH exhibited significantly lower surface roughness than RMGIC at all the tested intervals.


Subject(s)
Surface Properties , Toothbrushing/instrumentation , Microscopy, Atomic Force/instrumentation , Dental Materials , Glass Ionomer Cements , In Vitro Techniques/methods , Analysis of Variance , Statistics, Nonparametric , India/epidemiology
3.
Acta odontol. latinoam ; 33(3): 174-180, Dec. 2020. graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1278201

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT The aim of the present examiner-blind randomized controlled clinical study was to compare the efficacy two soft-bristle toothbrushes in terms of plaque removal. Seventy volunteers were randomly allocated to Group A (tapered-tip toothbrush) or Group B (end-rounded toothbrush). At baseline appointment (Day 0), volunteers underwent plaque examination using the Improved Plaque Identification Index. Under supervision, they brushed their teeth for 1 minute with their assigned toothbrushes and the plaque examination was repeated. Volunteers continued the oral hygiene regimen (assigned toothbrush and a regular dentifrice provided by the researchers) for 7 days. The experimental procedures of Day 0 were then repeated. Separate statistical analyses were performed for mean percent reduction of plaque in the whole-mouth, interproximal and gumline scores at both times, usingMann-Whitney test, p<0.05. After a single toothbrushing, on Day 0, mean percent plaque was significantly reduced in both groups (p<0.05), with statistically greater reductions of whole-mouth (21.39±12.44 vs. 11.40±11.17), gumline (6.32±7.37 vs. 2.89±4.57) and interproximal (10.82±10.49 vs. 5.21±7.68) for Group A as compared to Group B. However, on day 7, no significant difference was observed between groups for whole-mouth (29.94±20.91 vs. 26.58±18.64), gymline (14.04±18.82 vs. 13.78±17.63) and interproximal surfaces (26.41±22.77vs. 23.12±20.98) (p>0.05). In conclusion, on Day 0, Group A presented higher efficacy in supragingival plaque removal than Group B, as reflected by whole-mouth, gumline and interproximal plaque scores.


RESUMO O objetivo desse ensaio clínico, examinador-cego, randomizado e controle foi de comparadas a eficácia de duas escovas de cerdas macias em relagäo ao controle de placa. Setenta vo-luntários foram randomicamente alocados para Grupo A (es-cova com ponta cónica) ou Grupo B (escova com ponta arredondada). Na consulta inicial (dia 0), voluntarios receberam exame de placa utilizando o Índice de identificagäo de placa melhorado. Sob supervisäo, eles escovaram seus dentes por 1 minuto com as escovas designadas e o exame de placa foi repetido. Voluntarios continuaram seu regime de higiene oral (escova dental alocada e dentifrício comum fornecidos pelos pesquisadores) durante 7 dias. Os procedimentos da consulta inicial foram novamente repetidos. Análises estatísticas distintas foram realizadas para percentual de redugäo média de placa para os escores de boca toda, interproximal e linha gengi-val em ambos os momentos, utilizando teste de Mann-Whitney, p<0,05. Após único uso da escova, no dia 0, o percentual de redugäo média de placa foi significativamente reduzido em ambos os grupos (p<0,05), com reduções significativas para boca toda (21,39±12,44 vs. 11,40±11,17), linha gengival (6,32±7,37 vs. 2,89±4,57) e interproximal (10,82±10,49 vs. 5,21±7,68) no Grupo A quando comparada com o Grupo B. Entretanto, no dia 7, nenhuma diferenga significativa foi observada entre os grupos para boca toda (29,94±20,91 vs. 26,58±18,64), linha gengival (14,04±18,82 vs. 13,78±17,63) e interproximal (26,41±22,77 vs. 23,12±20,98) (p>0,05). Em conclusäo, no dia 0, a escova do Grupo A apresentou eficácia superior na remo-gäo de placa suprageng ival quando comparada com a escova do Grupo B, como demonstrado nos escores de placa de boca toda, linha gengival e interproximal.


Subject(s)
Humans , Toothbrushing/instrumentation , Dental Plaque/therapy , Gingivitis/therapy , Oral Hygiene , Single-Blind Method , Dental Plaque Index , Treatment Outcome , Biofilms
4.
Braz. oral res. (Online) ; 34: e057, 2020. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS, BBO | ID: biblio-1132713

ABSTRACT

Abstract Poor oral hygiene seems to be the norm in children and teenagers with Down Syndrome (DS). Advances in design and types of toothbrushes may improve biofilm control. This randomized, single-blind, crossover clinical trial evaluated the effectiveness of electric toothbrushes regarding mechanical control of biofilm in children and teenagers with DS and their cooperation. Twenty-nine participants with DS, aged 6 to 14 years, used both types of toothbrushes: electric (ET) and manual (MT). The order of use of the different types of toothbrushes was randomly defined, including a 7-day period with each type with 7-day washout period in between. The Turesky-Quigley-Hein biofilm index was used before and after brushing to assess the effectiveness of the technique. Frankl's behavioral scale was used during toothbrushing to assess the participants' cooperation. Paired T-test, Mann Whitney, Chi-square, and Fisher's Exact tests were applied, with a significance level of 5%. The quantity of dental biofilm was significantly reduced after both brushing techniques (p < 0.001). However, no significant difference was found in total biofilm (ET: 0.73 ± 0.36; MT: 0.73 ± 0.34; p = 0.985) or % biofilm reduction (ET: 72.22%; MT: 70.96%; p = 0.762) after brushing between techniques or in % biofilm reduction between toothbrushes of age groups (6 -9 years, p = 0.919; 10-14 years, p = 0.671). Participants showed similar cooperation level with the two types of toothbrush (p = 1.000). The use of electric or manual toothbrush had no effect on the quantity of dental biofilm removed in children and teenagers with DS, nor did it influence their cooperation during the procedure.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Child , Adolescent , Toothbrushing/instrumentation , Down Syndrome/physiopathology , Biofilms , Dental Devices, Home Care , Dental Plaque/prevention & control , Time Factors , Child Behavior , Adolescent Behavior , Treatment Outcome , Caregivers , Statistics, Nonparametric , Cross-Over Studies , Dental Caries/prevention & control , Equipment Design
5.
Pesqui. bras. odontopediatria clín. integr ; 20: e5300, 2020. tab, graf
Article in English | BBO, LILACS | ID: biblio-1135502

ABSTRACT

Abstract Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of a dispensing device specially developed to standardize the amount of fluoride dentifrice to be delivered on the toothbrush. The amount and variability of dentifrice applied using this device were compared with recommendations to apply dentifrice amounts equivalent to "rice size" or "pea-size". Material and Methods: Two dentifrices, one used by children (NaF/Silica-based) and one used by the entire family (MFP/CaCO3-based), and five methods to apply them on the toothbrush (pea and rice sizes, and three different amounts using the developed device) were tested by 12 volunteers. The amount of dentifrice placed on the toothbrush was weighed, and the experiment was repeated three times. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey test. Results: No differences were observed between the dentifrices used (p>0.05), but the method of application significantly affected the amount of dentifrice applied (p<0.05). Smaller amounts (p<0.05) and less variability were observed when the volunteers used the dispenser device than when they were asked to apply a pea or rice size. Conclusion: The device can help parents and caregivers to safely use fluoride dentifrice on children.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Toothbrushing/instrumentation , Toothpastes/chemistry , Preventive Dentistry/education , Dental Caries/prevention & control , Fluorosis, Dental , Parents , Brazil/epidemiology , Efficacy , Analysis of Variance , Data Interpretation, Statistical
6.
Rev. Fundac. Juan Jose Carraro ; 23(43): 44-51, 2019. ilus
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1050500

ABSTRACT

Los cepillos interproximales son una herramienta de higiene interdental que tiene variadas indicaciones y múltiples beneficios. Pacientes con enfermedad periodontal, conpapilas que no llenan el espacio interdentario, portadores de aparatología ortodóncica,prótesis fija o de implantes entre otros casos, pueden beneficiarse con su utilización. El presente artículo tiene como objetivo dar una orientación de su uso clínico basado en la evidencia científica disponible. Los resultados apoyan su utilización en combinación con el hilo dental para la prevención y tratamiento de las enfermedades bucales más prevalentes, con un efecto marcado sobre el control del biofilm y la inflamación gingival (AU)


Interproximal brushes are an interdental hygiene tool with diverse indications that have multiple benefits. Among other uses, they are indicated in patients with periodontal disease, with papillae that do not fill the interdental space, patients with orthodontic appliances, fixedprosthesis or implant-supported prosthesis. The aim of this article is provide guidance on their clinical use based on the available evidence. The results support their use in combination with dental floss for preventing and treating the most prevalent oral diseases, with a significant effect on biofilm control and gingival inflammation (AU)


Subject(s)
Oral Hygiene , Toothbrushing/instrumentation , Oral and Dental Hygiene Products , Periodontal Diseases/prevention & control , Dental Plaque/prevention & control
7.
J. appl. oral sci ; 27: e20180331, 2019. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS, BBO | ID: biblio-990103

ABSTRACT

Abstract The tongue is one of the primary sources of halitosis. The manual or mechanical removal of biofilm is known to decrease oral malodor. Objective: To evaluate a new tongue hygiene technique hereby referred to as "the X technique" and its effects on both halitosis and the number of microorganisms based on microbiological parameters and diagnostic features of the breath. Material and Methods: The study included thirty patients divided into a control group (patients without systematized guidelines of lingual hygiene, but who performed the mechanical cleaning of tongue dorsum, each in its own way), the 3R group (instructed to perform the movements of the X technique for 3 repetitions at each brushing), and the 6R group (instructed to perform 6 repetitions of the technique at each brushing). After two weeks, a new data collection was performed. Results: Patients in the 6R group presented the lowest score on the organoleptic assessment scale at the second consultation, followed by the 3R group and the controls. Regarding the self-perception of breath by the method of Visual Analog Scale (VAS), the control group did not perceive improvements in oral malodor; the results of the 3R group and the 6R group were similar. Conclusion: These results indicate that the X technique improves both measurements and perceptions of halitosis. Microbiological analyses revealed greatest reduction in the 6R group. The findings show that the X technique reduces both organoleptic scores and the number of bacterial colonies, and improves users' perceptions of their breath.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Aged , Young Adult , Oral Hygiene/methods , Tongue/microbiology , Halitosis/prevention & control , Oral Hygiene/instrumentation , Toothbrushing/instrumentation , Toothbrushing/methods , Analysis of Variance , Treatment Outcome , Statistics, Nonparametric , Biofilms , Diagnostic Self Evaluation , Visual Analog Scale , Middle Aged
8.
ImplantNewsPerio ; 2(5): 927-933, set.-out. 2017. graf
Article in Portuguese | LILACS, BBO | ID: biblio-877354

ABSTRACT

Objetivo: comparar o efeito de escovas multifilamentadas com as escovas dentais convencionais, na formação do biofilme dental bacteriano na área dentogengival, em indivíduos saudáveis. Material e métodos: para a realização deste estudo de delineamento prospectivo, cruzado, cego e randomizado, foram selecionados 16 voluntários periodontalmente saudáveis, os quais inicialmente foram submetidos a uma adequação bucal. Após sete dias de adequação, os indivíduos foram aleatoriamente divididos em quatro grupos: A) escova multifilamentos nacional (Sanifill Infinite); B) escova multifilamentos importada (Curaprox); C) escova convencional 1 (Bitufo Class macia); e D) escova convencional 2 (Oral B Indicator ), utilizando o mesmo dentifrício para os quatro grupos. Os voluntários foram instruídos a usarem somente o método de higiene referente ao grupo a que foram designados, por um período de 14 dias, com intervalos (washout) de sete dias entre os períodos experimentais. Durante o washout, todos os indivíduos fizeram uso de escovas, dentifrícios e fio dental padronizados. Os seguintes parâmetros clínicos foram avaliados nos tempos 0 e 14 dias: índice de placa visível e corada (IPV e IPC) e índice de sangramento gengival (ISG). Resultados: após análise dos dados, não foram observadas diferenças estatísticas (p > 0,05), nem intragrupo e nem intergrupo, para todos os parâmetros analisados. Conclusão: escovas convencionais e multifilamentadas foram igualmente eficazes no controle do biofilme dental bacteriano, na área dentogengival.


Objective: to compare the effect of multifilament toothbrushes and the conventional ones relating it to the formation of dental bacterial biofilm in the dentogingival region in healthy individuals. Material and methods: to conduct this study in a prospective, crossed, blind and randomized outlining way, sixteen periodontal healthy volunteers were selected and initially submitted to an oral adjustment. After seven days of adjustment, the individuals were randomly divided into four groups: A) the national multifilament toothbrush (Sanifi ll Infi nite); B) the imported multifilament toothbrush (Curaprox); C) the conventional toothbrush 1 (Bitufo Class Macia); and D) the conventional toothbrush 2 (Oral B Indicator); the same toothpaste was utilized by the four groups. The volunteers were instructed to the usage of only one method of oral hygiene which is related to the group they were designed for a period of fourteen days, with intervals (washout) of seven days between the experimental periods. During the washout, all the individuals made use of the toothbrushes, toothpastes and standardized dental floss. The following clinical parameters were evaluated at 0 day and 14 days: visible plaque index and disclosed plaque index (VPI and DPI) and gingival bleeding index (GBI). Results: no statistically significant differences were observed (p > 0,05), neither with the intragroup nor the intergroup in all the parameters analyzed. Conclusion: conventional toothbrushes and the multifilamented ones were equally effective in controling dental bacterial biofilm in the dentogingival region.


Subject(s)
Humans , Biofilms , Comparative Study , Dental Plaque/prevention & control , Toothbrushing/instrumentation
9.
Braz. oral res. (Online) ; 30(1): e6, 2016. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-768257

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of using a dishwasher or different chemical agents, including 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate, 2% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), a mouthrinse containing essential oils and alcohol, and 50% white vinegar, for toothbrush disinfection. Sixty volunteers were divided into five experimental groups and one control group (n = 10). Participants brushed their teeth using toothbrushes with standard bristles, and they disinfected the toothbrushes according to instructed methods. Bacterial contamination of the toothbrushes was compared between the experimental groups and the control group. Data were analyzed by Kruskal–Wallis and Duncan's multiple range tests, with 95% confidence intervals for multiple comparisons. Bacterial contamination of toothbrushes from individuals in the experimental groups differed from those in the control group (p < 0.05). The most effective method for elimination of all tested bacterial species was 50% white vinegar, followed in order by 2% NaOCl, mouthrinse containing essential oils and alcohol, 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate, dishwasher use, and tap water (control). The results of this study show that the most effective method for disinfecting toothbrushes was submersion in 50% white vinegar, which is cost-effective, easy to access, and appropriate for household use.


Subject(s)
Humans , Dental Devices, Home Care/microbiology , Disinfection/methods , Toothbrushing/instrumentation , Acetic Acid/chemistry , Anti-Bacterial Agents/chemistry , Colony Count, Microbial , Chlorhexidine/chemistry , Dental Disinfectants/chemistry , Escherichia coli/drug effects , Immersion , Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus/drug effects , Statistics, Nonparametric , Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Streptococcus mutans/drug effects , Time Factors
10.
Braz. oral res. (Online) ; 30(1): e134, 2016. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-952017

ABSTRACT

Abstract The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy in supragingival plaque removal of two soft-bristle toothbrushes. Seventy volunteers were allocated randomly to the Colgate Slim Soft or Curaprox CS5460 toothbrush grourps. At baseline appointment, volunteers underwent plaque examination using the Rustogi Modification of the Navy Plaque Index. Under supervision, they then brushed their teeth for 1minute with their assigned toothbrushes and the plaque examination was repeated. Volunteers performed daily oral hygiene with their assigned toothbrush and a regular dentifrice provided by the researchers for 7 days. The baseline experimental procedures were then repeated. Separate analyses of variance were performed for the whole-mouth, interproximal, and gumline plaque scores (p < 0.05). No difference in baseline pre-brushing scores was found between groups. After a single toothbrushing, the mean plaque score was significantly reduced in both groups (p < 0.05), with greater reduction of whole-mouth and interproximal plaque scores observed in the SlimSoft group compared with the Curaprox group (p < 0.05). After 7 days, the SlimSoft group showed greater reduction of the whole-mouth and interproximal plaque scores compared with the Curaprox group (p < 0.05). In conclusion, the SlimSoft toothbrush presented greater efficacy in supragingival plaque removal than did the Curaprox CS5460 toothbrush, as reflected by whole-mouth and interproximal plaque scores.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Aged , Young Adult , Toothbrushing/instrumentation , Dental Devices, Home Care , Dental Plaque/therapy , Oral Hygiene/instrumentation , Time Factors , Single-Blind Method , Dental Plaque Index , Treatment Outcome , Equipment Design , Middle Aged
11.
Braz. oral res. (Online) ; 30(1): e37, 2016. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-951953

ABSTRACT

Abstract Two previous clinical studies evaluated the effect of end-rounded versus tapered bristles of soft manual brushes on the removal of plaque and gingival abrasion. However, the combined effect of an abrasive dentifrice on these outcomes has yet to be understood. The purpose of the present study was to compare the incidence of gingival abrasion and the degree of plaque removal obtained after the use of toothbrushes with tapered or end-rounded bristles in the presence or absence of an abrasive dentifrice. The study involved a randomized, single-blind, crossover model (n = 39) with a split-mouth design. Subjects were instructed to refrain from performing oral hygiene procedures for 72 hours. Quadrants were randomized and subjects brushed with both types of toothbrushes using a dentifrice (relative dentin abrasion = ± 160). Plaque and gingival abrasion were assessed before and after brushing. After 7 days, the experiment was repeated without the dentifrice. The average reduction in plaque scores and the average increase in the number of abrasion sites were assessed by repeated-measures ANOVA and Bonferroni's post-hoc tests. End-rounded bristles removed significantly more plaque than tapered bristles, regardless of the use of a dentifrice. The dentifrice did not improve plaque removal. In the marginal area (cervical free gingiva), no difference in the incidence of gingival abrasion was detected between toothbrush types when used with a dentifrice (p ≥ 0.05). However, the dentifrice increased the incidence of abrasion (p < 0.001), irrespective of the toothbrush type tested. End-rounded bristles therefore removed plaque more effectively without causing a higher incidence of gingival abrasion when compared with tapered bristles. An abrasive dentifrice can increase the incidence of abrasion, and should be used with caution by individuals who are at risk of developing gingival recession.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Young Adult , Toothbrushing/instrumentation , Dental Devices, Home Care , Dental Plaque/therapy , Dentifrices/chemistry , Gingiva/chemistry , Oral Hygiene/adverse effects , Surface Properties , Toothbrushing/adverse effects , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Epidemiologic Methods , Treatment Outcome , Dentifrices/adverse effects , Equipment Design , Gingival Recession/etiology
12.
J. appl. oral sci ; 22(3): 152-158, May-Jun/2014. tab
Article in English | LILACS, BBO | ID: lil-711713

ABSTRACT

Objectives: The intraoral transmission of cariogenic and periodontopathogenic species seems to be facilitated by contaminated toothbrushes and other oral hygiene devices. The aim of this investigation was to analyze the in vitro retention and survival rate of Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sanguinis on different toothbrushes. The impacts of human saliva and antimicrobial toothpaste on these parameters were further evaluated. Material and Methods: Part I: Four toothbrushes (Colgate 360°, Curaprox CS5460 ultra soft, elmex InterX, Trisa Flexible Head3) were contaminated by S. mutans DSM 20523 or S. sanguinis DSM 20068 suspensions for three minutes. Bacteria were removed from the toothbrushes after either three minutes (T0) or 24 hours (T24) of dry storage and grown on Columbia blood agar plates for the quantification of colony-forming units (CFUs). Part II: The effects of saliva from a caries-active or a caries-inactive person and of toothpaste containing 0.12% chlorhexidine digluconate were also tested. Results: Part I: After three minutes of dry storage, approximately one percent of the bacteria were still detectable on the toothbrushes. After 24 hours, S. sanguinis exhibited a more pronounced decrease in viable cell numbers compared with S. mutans but the differences were not significant (Kruskal-Wallis test, p>0.05). Part II: The addition of human saliva from a caries-active or caries-inactive person slightly increased the retention of both streptococcal species at T0. The use of toothpaste had no influence on the amount of viable streptococci at T0, but it reduced the microbial load after 24 hours of storage. There were only slight nonsignificant differences (p>0.05) between the four toothbrushes. Conclusions: In vitro bacterial retention and survival of S. sanguinis and S. mutans on different toothbrushes occurred. Within the limitations of this study, the use of human saliva or an antimicrobial toothpaste ...


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Dental Devices, Home Care/microbiology , Saliva/microbiology , Streptococcus mutans/growth & development , Streptococcus sanguis/growth & development , Toothbrushing/instrumentation , Toothpastes/pharmacology , Anti-Infective Agents/pharmacology , Bacterial Adhesion , Bacterial Load , Chlorhexidine/analogs & derivatives , Chlorhexidine/pharmacology , Dental Caries/microbiology , Materials Testing , Statistics, Nonparametric , Streptococcus mutans/drug effects , Streptococcus sanguis/drug effects , Surface Properties , Time Factors
14.
Braz. dent. j ; 24(2): 142-146, Mar-Apr/2013. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-675659

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to estimate the intake of toothpaste fluoride used by children aged 2 to 6 years (n=87) treated at a hospital of a medium-sized city (Campina Grande, PB) in the Northeastern region of Brazil. Data regarding sociodemographic characteristics of families and children's toothbrushing were collected from questionnaire-based interviews with parents/guardians, and the amount of fluoride used during toothbrushing was estimated using a precision scale for assessment of the risk of dental fluorosis, considering a cutoff value of 0.07 mgF/kg body weight/day. Fluoride content in the toothpastes was analyzed using a specific fluoride electrode. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics using the chi-square and Fisher's exact tests (α=0.05). Considering the use of the derice, the risk of fluorosis in the children was 19.5%. There was significant association (p<0.05) between the risk of fluorosis, brushing frequency, type of derice and who performed the child's oral hygiene. It was concluded that a high percentage of children in the studied sample used toothpaste inappropriately and were at risk of developing dental fluorosis.


Resumo O objetivo do presente trabalho foi estimar a ingestão de flúor de derícios utilizados por crianças de 2 a 6 anos de idade (n=87) atendidas em um hospital de médio porte (Campina Grande, PB) na região nordeste do Brasil. Os dados envolveram características sócio-demográficas e escovação dentária das crianças através de uma entrevista com formulário específico, aplicado aos pais/responsáveis, e a quantidade de flúor utilizada na escovação da criança, por meio de balança de precisão, para avaliação do risco de fluorose dentária, considerando o ponto de corte 0,07 mgF/kg peso corporal/dia. O conteúdo de flúor nos cremes dentais foi analisado utilizando eletrodo específico. Os dados foram trabalhados sob a forma de estatística descritiva e inferencial usando o testes do Qui-quadrado de Pearson e Exato de Fisher (α= 0,05). Levando-se em consideração o uso do derício, o risco de fluorose das crianças pesquisadas foi 19,5%. Houve associação significativa entre o risco de fluorose, a frequência de escovação, o tipo de derício e quem realiza a higiene bucal da criança (p<0,05). Concluiu-se que elevada parcela das crianças usavam o derício de forma inadequada e apresentaram risco de fluorose. .


Subject(s)
Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Male , Young Adult , Cariostatic Agents/administration & dosage , Fluorides/administration & dosage , Toothpastes/administration & dosage , Beverages , Body Weight , Cross-Sectional Studies , Cariostatic Agents/analysis , Educational Status , Fluorides/analysis , Fluorosis, Dental/etiology , Income , Ion-Selective Electrodes , Marital Status , Oral Hygiene/methods , Parents , Risk Factors , Toothbrushing/instrumentation , Toothbrushing/methods , Toothpastes/analysis , Water Supply
15.
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-660039

ABSTRACT

La aparatología empleada en los tratamientos de ortodoncia, favorece la retención de placa bacteriana y dificulta su eliminación por parte del paciente, aumentando el riesgo de desarrollar caries, manchas blancas y enfermedad periodontal. Diferentes cepillos dentales se han desarrollado para facilitar la mantención de una adecuada higiene oral en estos pacientes, sin embargo, se ha observado que los cepillos comunmente indicados (cepillo ortodóncico mas cepillo unipenacho), no siempre son bien manejados y difícilmente se usan ambos. El cepillo Cross Action Pro-Salud®, se ha presentado como una alternativa simple de usar y de transportar, por ser un único cepillo que combina las caracteristicas de los dos cepillos comunmente recomendados. Para evaluar la efectividad de este cepillo, en comparación con la prescripción convencional, se evaluaron 2 grupos, de 23 pacientes cada uno, portadores de aparatología fija. Un grupo utilizó la prescripción habitual y un segundo grupo utilizó cepillo Cross Action Pro-Salud®, por un período de 45 días. Los indices de higiene de O`leary, de placa en brackets y gingival modificado fueron registrados al inicio y 45 días después del uso diario de los cepillos antes mencionados. Se utilizó test-t para comparar los resultados obtenidos y se determinó que se produjo una disminución significativa en los tres indices de higiene, no existiendo diferencias en los resultados obtenidos entre ambas prescripciones. El cepillo Oral-B Cross-Action Pro-Salud® es una alternativa recomendable, ya que permite eliminar efectivamente la placa bacteriana en pacientes ortodónticos, y al ser un único cepillo, facilita y acorta el tiempo de cepillado.


Orthodontic fixed appliances include elements that allow the accumulation of bacterial plaque, making tooth brushing more difficult and increasing the risk of developing caries, white spot lesions, and periodontal disease. Several toothbrushes designs have been developed to facilitate oral hygiene in orthodontic patients; however, it has been observed that most patients do not take enough time to brush using adequately both commonly prescribed toothbrushes (Oral-B End-Tufted® and Oral-B Orthodontic® brushes). Oral B Cross Action Pro-Health® has been presented as an alternative, easier to use and to transport. To assess the effectiveness of Cross Action Pro-Health® versus commonly prescribed toothbrushes, two randomly assigned groups of 23 orthodontic patients each, were evaluated. One group of patients used commonly prescribed toothbrushes and the second group used Cross Action Pro-Health®. O`Leary, modified gingival and Bracket plaque index were measured before and 45 days after the daily use of the two mentioned toothbrushes prescriptions. T-test was used to detect statistically significant differences among the brushes for each index. The results demonstrated a significant reduction of the three indexes with the daily use of Cross Action Pro-Health® and no differences were found versus commonly used prescription. Orthodontic patients may benefit from the use of a single brush prescription (Cross Action Pro-Health®), because effective plaque removal can be achieved easier and faster.


Subject(s)
Humans , Toothbrushing/instrumentation , Toothbrushing/methods , Orthodontic Appliances , Dental Plaque/therapy , Case-Control Studies , Dental Plaque Index , Oral Hygiene/instrumentation , Oral Hygiene/methods , Oral Hygiene Index , Periodontal Index
16.
J. appl. oral sci ; 20(5): 517-521, Sept.-Oct. 2012. ilus, graf, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-654914

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to test a new portable vibrator for plaster pouring (developed for this purpose), comparing the effect of its use on the accuracy of working cast of implant-supported restorations to the conventional vibrator. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From a master cast with 2 implants, 30 transfer moldings were made randomly and divided into three groups: Group I (GI): pouring performed in an outsourced dental laboratory with conventional plaster vibrator (10 casts), Group II (GII): pouring performed in the laboratory of the Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC) with conventional plaster vibrator (10 casts) and Group III (GIII): pouring performed with the portable vibrator fabricated for this study (10 casts). The position of the analogue and marginal adaptation of the infrastructure were verified by testing the single screw on the master model and on the working model. The measurement of misfit was blindly performed with a precision microscope and analyzing unit, Quadra-Check 200. The data were statistically analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Holm-Sidak test (α=0.05). RESULTS: Means±standard deviations were as follows: GI: 19.19±4.73 µm; GII: 21.72±5.41 µm; GIII: 13.5±2.39 µm (P<0.05), with GIII significantly lower as compared to the other groups. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, it was concluded that a greater accuracy of working cast was achieved when a portable vibrator was used for casting molds.


Subject(s)
Dental Abutments , Dental Marginal Adaptation , Models, Dental , Dental Casting Technique/instrumentation , Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported/instrumentation , Vibration , Calcium Sulfate , Dental Impression Materials , Dental Impression Technique , Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported/methods , Equipment Design , Materials Testing , Random Allocation , Reproducibility of Results , Toothbrushing/instrumentation
17.
Braz. oral res ; 26(4): 360-365, July-Aug. 2012. graf, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-640711

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of two manual toothbrushes (conventional and orthodontic). The following clinical parameters were used: VPI (visible plaque index) and GBI (gingival bleeding index). Patients, 64 total (30 males and 34 females), in the permanent dentition, with a mean age of 17.8 years, were randomly selected from a practice specializing in orthodontics. Each participant received audio-visual instructions on oral hygiene as well as a kit of materials containing two manual toothbrushes (orthodontic and conventional). Each toothbrush was randomly allocated to one side of the mouth (split-mouth design) and used for a period of approximately 4 weeks. The VPI and GBI were measured by a single calibrated examiner before (T0) and after (T1) the implementation of interventions. The Mann-Whitney test was used to compare the VPI values between the groups, and the Student t-test for independent samples was used to compare GBI values. The level of significance was set at 5%. No statistically significant difference was observed between the groups at T0 for both VPI and GBI, and at T1 for the GBI. The manual orthodontic toothbrush produced a statistically lower VPI (P < 0.05) at T1, but this did not seem to be of clinical importance.


Subject(s)
Adolescent , Female , Humans , Dental Devices, Home Care , Toothbrushing/instrumentation , Dental Plaque Index , Equipment Design , Orthodontic Appliances , Oral Hygiene/methods , Periodontal Index , Statistics, Nonparametric , Toothbrushing/methods
19.
J. appl. oral sci ; 20(1): 32-37, Jan.-Feb. 2012. ilus, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-618150

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated in vitro the efficiency of Aloe vera and propolis dentifrice on reducing the contamination of toothbrush bristles by a standard strain of Streptococcus mutans (ATCC 25175; SM), after toothbrushing. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifteen sterile toothbrushes were randomly divided into 5 toothbrushing groups: I (negative control): without dentifrice; II: with fluoridated dentifrice; III: with triclosan and gantrez dentifrice; IV (positive control): without dentifrice and irrigation with 10 mL of 0.12 percent chlorhexidine gluconate; V: with Aloe vera and propolis dentifrice. In each group, 1 sterile bovine tooth was brushed for 1 min, where the toothbrush bristles were contaminated with 25 µL of SM. After toothbrushing, the bristles were stored in individual test tubes with 3 mL of BHI under anaerobiosis of 37°C for 48 h. Then, they were seeded with sterile swab in triplicate in the Mitis salivarius - Bacitracin culture medium. The samples were kept under anaerobiosis of 37°C for 48 h. Scores were used to count the number of colony forming units (cfu). The results were submitted to the Mann-Whitney statistical test at 5 percent significance level. RESULTS: There was statistically significant difference (p<0.05) for the reduction of bristle contamination comparing groups II, III, IV and V to group I. CONCLUSIONS: It may be stated that after toothbrushing, the Aloe vera and propolis dentifrice reduced the contamination of toothbrush bristles by SM, without differentiation from the other chemical agents used.


Subject(s)
Animals , Cattle , Aloe , Dentifrices , Dental Devices, Home Care/microbiology , Propolis , Streptococcus mutans , Sterilization/methods , Toothbrushing/instrumentation , Colony Count, Microbial , Culture Media , Random Allocation , Stem Cells , Streptococcus mutans/growth & development , Time Factors
20.
Braz. dent. j ; 23(6): 667-671, 2012. ilus, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-662424

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this in vitro study was to quantify the alterations on human root dentin permeability after exposure to different acid fruit juices and to evaluate the effect of toothbrushing with electric or sonic toothbrush after acid exposure. The root dentin of 50 extracted third molars was exposed with a high speed bur. Crowns were sectioned above the cementoenamel junction and root fragments were used to prepare dentin specimens. Specimens were randomly assigned to 5 groups according to the fruit juice (kiwifruit, starfruit, green apple, pineapple and acerolla). Each specimen was connected to a hydraulic pressure apparatus to measure root dentin permeability using fluid filtration method after the following sequential steps: I) conditioning with 37% phosphoric acid for 30 s, II) root scaling, III) exposure to acid fruit juices for 5 min and IV) electric or sonic toothbrushing without dentifrice for 3 min. Data were analyzed statistically by the Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney tests at 5% significance level. All fruit juices promoted a significant increase of dentin permeability while toothbrushing decreased it significantly (p<0.05). It may be concluded that all acid fruit juices increased root dentin permeability, while toothbrushing without dentifrice after acid exposure decreased the permeability. The toothbrush mechanism (electric or sonic) had no influence on the decrease of root dentin permeability.


O objetivo deste trabalho in vitro foi quantificar as alterações na permebilidade da dentina radicular humana após exposição a diferentes sucos de frutas ácidas e avaliar o efeito da escovação, com escova elétrica ou sônica, após a exposição ácida. A dentina radicular de 50 terceiros molares foi exposta com a utilização de fresas em alta rotação. As coroas foram seccionadas acima da junção cemento-esmalte e apenas os fragmentos radiculares foram utilizados no preparo dos espécimes. Os espécimes foram aleatoriamente divididos em 5 grupos de acordo com o suco de fruta aplicado (kiwi, carambola, maça verde, abacaxi e acerola). Cada espécime foi conectado a um aparelho de pressão para medir a permeabilidade dentinária por meio do método de filtração de líquidos após as seguintes etapas sequências: I) condicionamento com ácido fosfórico 37% durante 30 s, II) raspagem da raiz, III) exposição aos sucos de frutas por 5 min, IV) escovação com escova elétrica ou sônica durante 3 min. Os dados foram analisados estatisticamente pelos testes Wilcoxon e Mann-Whitney com nível de significância de 5%. Os resultados mostraram que todos os sucos de frutas testados promoveram aumento significativo da permeabilidade dentinária e os procedimentos de escovação causaram diminuição. Pode-se concluir que os sucos de frutas ácidas aumentaram a permeabilidade da dentina radicular, enquanto que a escovação sem dentifrício imediatamente após a exposição ácida promoveu redução da permeabilidade. Além disso, o mecanismo da escova (elétrica ou sônica) não teve influência na redução da permeabilidade dentinária.


Subject(s)
Humans , Beverages , Dentin Permeability/drug effects , Dentin/drug effects , Fruit , Tooth Root/drug effects , Toothbrushing/methods , Acids , Actinidia/chemistry , Ananas/chemistry , Magnoliopsida/chemistry , Electrical Equipment and Supplies , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Materials Testing , Malpighiaceae/chemistry , Malus/chemistry , Phosphoric Acids/pharmacology , Smear Layer , Sonication/instrumentation , Toothbrushing/instrumentation
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL